Wednesday, February 23, 2011

GUILTY PLEASURES: ROSIE RADIO
AND WHY WISCONSIN MATTERS





Yesterday Rosie O'Donnell had comedian / Sirius talk radio host Pete Dominick on the show, and they spoke for a good half or or so about the lack of media coverage of the unrest in Wisconsin.

(In case you missed it, Wisco's governor and other tea-partiers are invoking a budget crisis in order to eliminate the people's right to collective bargaining. So the people have marched on the Capitol. In order to postpone a vote, a score of Democrats are in hiding out of state (so they lack a quorum).

Rosie went off on how the media is giving top billing to the unrest in Libya and Bahrain - while the real unrest, and the real test of democracy, is happening right here under our noses.

Yes, what is happening in the Middle East will affect gas prices. But what is happening here in the Midwest is far more relevant to people's little-r reality, since it could signal the demise of the middle class. And it's not just Wisconsin. Indiana's Democrats also went into hiding this week, for the same reason, and hundreds of protesters in Ohio are trying to get on the agenda to testify on a similar bill. Even Michigan is getting in on the act (but not Illinois of course; we're too tamasic - although we are playing host to the AWOL Wisco democrats) Read more here and here.

(You can bet that if this were happening in California or New York - and not just the Midwest - there'd be slightly better media coverage).


Rosie was impassioned about the mass demonstrations and unrest, and blamed the lopsided media coverage on Ronald Reagan's deregulation of media (I think she may have meant the TelCom Act of 1996 - which happened on Clinton's watch and put control of the media into the hands of a handful of corporations. Reagan was responsible for throwing out the Fairness Doctrine, which required both sides of an issue to be covered by the media. Its elimination paved the way for Rush Limbaugh, Fox "News" and their ilk).

She is correct in saying that the media is controlled by a handful of megacorporations that determine what winds up on the news (it's actually six; click here for a chart).

Rosie and her guest said that somehow the political right (and Fox "News," et al) has convinced a large chunk of the middle class that access to health care, and the opportunity to join unions who look out for their interests, bargain with governments and corporations on their behalf, etc., are somehow bad for them - even though unions basically keep the middle class afloat (and are the working class's sole lobbying advocate in Washington).

Instead, Pete Dominick pointed out, the right holds up an anecdote about a teacher somewhere who has a large pension, and says "This has to stop," and "this is the cause of all our problems," and everyone gets on board (even Dreyfus brought up one of these anecdotes yesterday). Instead, the right invokes a budget crisis and says that it can be cured by taking money away from working people. Meanwhile, corporate welfare - where the real piles of money are siphoned off - continues unwatched and unfettered.

They also pointed out that the political right gets people to vote based on volatile peripheral issues, like gun control, abortion or gay marriage - and they end up voting against their own economic self-interest.


Dominick said that if the unions lose the power of collective bargaining, it will signal the slow demise of the middle class; unions are the only lobbying group looking out for the working-people's interests and representing them in Washington. All the other major lobbyists represent big business. He pointed out that unions don't just protect their own; good working conditions for union members mean better working conditions (and pay!) for everyone.
(BTW, if the unions are routed, the democratic party will also die).

Rosie was amazing. She yelled and screamed with righteous indignation, and it fired up her listeners. She really has her heart in the right place (I think she is a yogi, because she has a platform and she uses it for good). You can read more about her views here.

She said we should all be talking about this, and trying to do something about it.

Instead, we're worried about gas prices and wondering what Colonel Quadaffe (who used to be in America's crosshairs, back in the 80s) is going to do next.

I suppose that just as Chicago gets the mayor it deserves....

America gets the news coverage - and governors - it deserves.







-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FULL DISCLOSURE: I am a member of the Authors Guild (a union! that advocates for me!) and have been covering the media since 1993. (And if there were a yoga teacher's union with teeth, I'd join it, too).

9 comments:

mcgp said...

FOX LIES!!! I've been saying for years so many stupid people vote against their economic interest. Tea Baggers need to go away!

rhh said...

As a member of the teacher’s union for years, you know where I stand in support of the teachers. However, it seems that sometimes take a crisis like this to remind us of why we joined.

BTW: If you are on FaceBook, there are several sites you can join in support of the WI union protestors.

AND YES --- FOX LIES!!!!

Ralph from DeKalb

Ann said...

Hi,
Thank you for such an informative post. It's nice to read something that shows such a degree of sanity. My husband is a steelworker and in the union. His whole family has been in unions for many years. We don't understand how people can be brainwashed into believing that businesses (that are using people as resources) would look out for us against their own bottom lines. It's incredibly frustrating. People are cutting their own throats.

Lush Limbagh said...

The teachers out protesting when they should be teaching (although they have fake sick slips for liberal Dr.s) should all be canned.
At some point everyday taxpayers will be bled dry by the unions of the public workers.
You all are too dumb to see it, 'cause you like feeding at the endless feed trough.

Anonymous said...

So: Would a tea partier be welcome in one of your yoga classes? I mean: could you, as the teacher, whole-heartedly welcome them in the same way you could welcome a union member, assuming you knew their political positions? Would you feel that the tea partier obviously has much further to go in "getting" yoga, in light of their "unenlightened" political viewpoint? Are Democrats inherently more yogic than Republicans? I'm a life-long Democrat who's also totally in favor of repositioning unions in our society. After reading this post, I feel a little too intimidated to take a yoga class with you. Is that "my problem" because you're right and I'm wrong, or because, yogically you know, I'm the only one responsible for my responses? Isn't it natural to feel that a person "in authority" (ie., yoga teacher) might not be able to view me as just another yoga student when they've so strongly expressed a viewpoint contrary to my own? How does being a neutral transmitter of the yogic teachings fit with taking public political stands? Let the tea party yoga students find the tea party yoga teachers (if there are any; ha-ha-ha)?
Just askin'.

g.d. said...

The good news is that there is no such thing as a "neutral transmitter" of yogic philosophy. Moreover, I would not seek instruction from anyone who believes that neutrality is the ideal. I would be even more wary of someone who strives to be opinion-less when it comes to matters of the world (and heart).

C.K. said...

Lush - Is that the argument Fox news is making today? Well, you're right - it is the unions who are bleeding the taxpayers dry. They are the problem! Not the corporations / politicians. It's the unions, stupid!! (Actually, I think the students are learning far more at the protests about life, America and the political process than they would be in class).

Anon - I think you are trying to start a fight. I'll take the bait. *Once.*

The post above says what Rosie said on her radio show. It does not say how I feel about the Tea Party. It does say that I am pro-union, yes. I am also pro-little guy. Of course I am. And I think that what has happened to the media is a travesty.

As for teaching, I don't ask people their political views when teaching a yoga class (or ever, really, except when asking my friend who she voted for on Tuesday), and I don't bring up mine. It's largely irrelevant.

Everyone is welcome in class, and everyone can make the same spiritual progress / shape of a triangle, regardless of some external political ideas. Underneath, we're all the same. In class, we're all the same.

I've never asked a student about their politics and don't plan to start.

That said, if I knew who there were a tea party person in class, I would probably have more compassion for them (and they might even get more adjustments). But not less. As C.O. says, "Someone has to play Ravana."

Lush Limbagh said...

Of course the Wis. out of school kids are learning more at the protest.
Their teachers stink and are overpaid.
Thank you for making my point valid!

C.K. said...

Lush - The maya is so great, I'll be extra nice to you when you come to class.

How are those back exercises I showed you working, by the way?